Main Page Contact Register Log In


for 1e) the axioms of the theory under which the result is derived is known to be often violated and thus the result is not valid in those situations. We have increased reason to acertain that the thoery indeed applies in this case or if we can't do that in effect calcualte the probaility that the axioms are not sufficiently disturbed. Even if the reason for the disruption would be any previously catalogued one we can still kinda expect one migth be lurking around. Contrast this with CP- or CPT-symmetry breaking.

One plausible story would be that emploerys have to use employees in more demanding jobs ie that the new improved results are not from doing the same work with better quality but genuinely different work. This is like lifting too light weigths. If you just weight up you migth get better returns on your time at the gym which you might not have gotten if you did the thing with the light weight with better technique.

If employers can't capture more worth from "heavy duty" than from "light duty" work they might be pretty indifferent to the total efficiency. That is if you are making the same profits does it matter if your business is small or large? However the societal impact of people getting more bang for their buck is interesting even if the employer doesn't have any incentive to do that but on the flip side he doesn't have anything to object for either.