Democrazy doesn't necesarily mean that everybody gets to decide. It means that those that do decide are trusted by the people. If a lot of people found what the leaders are doing unsuitable to running a country do you think they should still be allowed to lead in the same style because they can hit their easily defined metrics?
This would be a lot more viable if GDP would straight correlate how happy people are. However in practise a lot of key objectives do not submit to easy definition.
Do you think that if a election promise promised 10 percent decrease in unemployment they should be sacked if it decreased only 9 % when during their reign natural disasters happened 300% more often? |
