I see what you mean, but in theory, trade is supposed to make both parties better off, or else the transaction wouldn't occur (if the price is too high, the buyers would rather keep their money; if too low, the sellers would keep their products). Unless some people are systematically forced into accepting bad bargains, trade shouldn't necessarily lead to unfair outcomes.
Besides, like I said, I'm looking for arguments in favour of enthusiastic support of wealth inequality, rather than arguments for its inevitability. |