Main Page Contact Register Log In



Hillary doesn't argue that new laws should be passed for that purpose


She wants to appoint Supreme Court Justices to overturn the decisions. I don't see how the distinction matters.


Citizens United wasn't a newspaper.


So? Or is your argument that free speech should only apply to specifically designated newspapers?






Or is your argument that free speech should only apply to specifically designated newspapers?
My argument is not about who should have free speech.
The fact that you think it is suggests speaks of the fact that you confuse deontological claims with questions of predicting reality. Confusing the two with each other is a good sign of not reasoning clearly and therefore making bad predictions.
61%
ChristianKl
stars0
Replies (1)