Main Page Contact Register Log In


Or is your argument that free speech should only apply to specifically designated newspapers?
My argument is not about who should have free speech.
The fact that you think it is suggests speaks of the fact that you confuse deontological claims with questions of predicting reality. Confusing the two with each other is a good sign of not reasoning clearly and therefore making bad predictions.







My argument is not about who should have free speech.


Then what is it about? It was originally about what Trump would do as president and how it differs from Hillary? So is your argument that Hillary would stop at letting specially designated newspapers have total free speech while, restricting citizen movie makers' right to criticize her? Somehow I don't find that a believable position.
61%
VoiceOfRa
stars0
Replies (0)